What Does Warren Buffett See in Renewable Energy?

By David Repka

Remember the commercial from the 1980s with the punchline, “when E.F. Hutton talks, people listen“? The same almost mythical power holds true in commercial real estate for legendary billionaire investor Sam Zell. When Zell makes moves to buy or sell, people sit up and take notice. Looks like the world of renewables have a new patron saint capable of hushing a room, self-made mega billionaire Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett

When the “Oracle of Omaha” speaks people not only listen, but take action. His most recent investment thesis that has gained the public’s attention is his investments in the renewable energy space. Has Buffett suddenly grown fascinated by helping dolphin babies? No, it’s all about the Benjamins!

Buffett is investing in renewable energy because it offers stunning risk / reward opportunity. Buffett is investing not in technology, but in projects that create long-term, durable income streams from investment quality counter-parties. A renewable energy project is a “bond in disguise” paying steady predictable income streams. Buffett gets a positive arbitrage over the yield that similar duration bonds yield for taking the construction risk and liquidity risk of not being able to sell a fixed asset like a solar farm with a moment’s notice like a corporate bond can be sold.

To read the story that inspired this blog post – click here.

Tax Credit in Doubt, Wind Power Industry Is Withering

Original Article from the NYTimes By Diane Cardwell
Published: September 20, 2012
Blogger Comments by David Repka 

FAIRLESS HILLS, Pa. — Last month, Gamesa, a major maker of wind turbines, completed the first significant order of its latest innovation: a camper-size box that can capture the energy of slow winds, potentially opening new parts of the country to wind power.

But by the time the last of the devices, worth more than $1.25 million, was hitched to a rail car, Gamesa had furloughed 92 of the 115 workers who made them. 

“We are all really sad,” said Miguel Orobiyi, 34, who worked as a mechanical assembler at the Gamesa plant for nearly five years. “I hope they call us back because they are really, really good jobs.”

Similar cuts are happening throughout the American wind sector, which includes hundreds of manufacturers, from multinationals that make giant windmills to smaller local manufacturers that supply specialty steel or bolts. In recent months, companies have announced almost 1,700 layoffs.

At its peak in 2008 and 2009, the industry employed about 85,000 people, according to the American Wind Energy Association, the industry’s principal trade group.

About 10,000 of those jobs have disappeared since, according to the association, as wind companies have been buffeted by weak demand for electricity, stiff competition from cheap natural gas and cheaper options from Asian competitors. Chinese manufacturers, who can often underprice goods because of generous state subsidies, have moved into the American market and have become an issue in the larger trade tensions between the countries. In July, the United States Commerce Department imposed tariffs on steel turbine towers from China after finding that manufacturers had been selling them for less than the cost of production.

And now, on top of the business challenges, the industry is facing a big political problem in Washington: the Dec. 31 expiration of a federal tax credit that makes wind power more competitive with other sources of electricity.

[BLOGGER COMMENT: Since Richard Nixon every candidate for POTUS has talked about having a "national energy policy". The trouble is that once the swoon of the election season has passed they have promptly forgotten about this campaign promise to refocus on other issues. The result is that we have a BIPOLAR ENERGY POLICY by default: We range from creating incentives to encourage the private sector to maniacally pursue renewable energy to a depressed state where anything close to an incentive or tax advantage is forbidden and ridiculed. We will never achieve energy independence if    cohesive energy policy is just lip service.]

View Original Article from the NYTimes

Solar Power: It’s Not Just for Hippie Freaks Anymore

Sunrun ads poke fun at clichés about green-energy users
Original Article by David Gianatasio in AdWeek – Blogger Comment by David Repka

This fun campaign from solar-power company Sunrun and ad agency Heat should make conventional utility companies green with envy. The writing’s excellent—far better than my silly lead sentence—in three well-acted spots that invert viewer expectations by presenting Sunrun customers as primarily motivated by the desire to save money, rather than new-age, bleeding-heart concerns. In each ad, actors spar with off-screen voiceovers. One vignette shows a middle-aged couple gardening in their yard. When the narration suggests they went solar “to save dolphin babies all over the world,” the husband replies, “No. It’s more the money thing.” Announcer: “But what about the dolphin babies?” Wife: “Well, that’s great, too. But we really like to save money.” A second spot finds a burly guy doing a woodworking project in his garage. Voiceover: “Scott was the first on his block to call up Sunrun, who helped him switch over to solar for no money down. But that wasn’t even the best part.” Scott assures him, “Yes it was,” and after some back and forth, delivers the campaign’s best line: “Shhh, voice man. I’m trying to build something here.” The understated humor plays to perfection, and the sales pitch feels unforced and affable. Bright idea, Sunrun! These spots could really make lightbulbs come on for some consumers. Two more ads after the jump.

[BLOGGER COMMENT] No, I don’t drive a Prius nor am I writing this while wearing Birkenstocks or munching on a bowl of granola. I am a capitalist. I’ve spent the last 27 years building a skill set in the commercial real estate industry that I am transitioning into developing renewable energy projects. Why? Not because of Dolphin Babies, but because trillions need to be spent to rebuild our global electrical infrastructure. Renewable energy makes sense for tree huggers, the Red State energy independence folks and capitalists, like me. The price of solar equipment is plunging. Soon solar will be at parity with natural gas and we will have created a new world.

What will our energy future look like with 40 cent per Watt solar panels?

By David Repka 

The solar industry has taken some body blows with the high profile bankruptcies of Solyndra, ECD & Evergreen over the last few months. A new technology is transitioning from the lab to commercial production that will be the knock-out blow to any teetering solar technology companies. A quick recap… Solyndra went bust because their cost of production was $6 a watt at the time the global markets were paying $3 a watt for solar modules that collect sunlight and make electricity. Prices of solar modules have gapped down considerably over the last year.

Twin Creeks Technologies has designed a process to make thin-film solar for about 40 cents a watt. This is a 50% decrease from current panel prices.

The “Moore’s Law” progression of solar technology will soon enable solar project developers to compete on price with the current benchmark, natural gas. In this blogger’s view the share of renewable energy sources of production as a percentage of the overall energy mix has been dramatically underestimated. As we look to the future the energy buying public will demand a larger mix of production from green, non-polluting renewable resources. Solar project developers create projects using the best technology available at the time they plan their project and sell the electricity that is generated to a specific commercial off-taker or to “the grid” under a long-term power purchase agreement. The decrease in materials costs means project developers can charge ever lower prices to their customers.

Visit this link more on Twin Creeks.

China Sets New Record For Renewable Energy Storage

By Ucilia Wang, Contributor to Forbes – Blogger Comments by David Repka

BYD Co., which counts Warren Buffett as an investor, has completed the world’s largest lithium-ion battery project to bottle wind and solar electricity in China (see photo), which will likely see more large energy storage projects as a result of its ambition to add lots of renewable energy.

The Chinese electric car and battery maker finished the 36 megawatt-hours storage farm in December for the State Grid Corporation of China, a transmission company with a massive plan to pair storage with wind and solar power plants, said Micheal Austin, vice president of BYD America on Tuesday. BYD’s batteries will help to store electricity from the first phase of the plan, which includes 100 megawatts of wind and 40 megawatts of solar energy systems in the northern province of Hebei.

State Grid has told BYD that it wants to expand the plan to include 500 megawatts of wind and 100 megawatts solar and build 110 megawatts of storage to bank some of the renewable energy and discharge it when needed, Austin said. Wind, in particular, tends to blow stronger at night, when electricity demand is lower, making it desirable to store it for later use.

“Battery is fantastic because you can charge it for daytime use. It’s a green energy generation site,” Austin said.

The Rise of Energy Storage Market

The growth in wind and solar electricity generation has prompted utilities to consider energy storage as a way to manage supply and demand. Wind turbines and solar arrays only produce power at certain times of the day, and their power output can diminish quickly when the wind dies or the sun hides behind the clouds. That sudden drop is bad news for utilities, which will have to turn up their other, often fossil fuel-based power plants to make up for the shortfall. But a coal or gas turbine takes some minutes to crank out more power. If utilities don’t find other power sources to fill in during that powering-up period, then there could be a brownout or a blackout.

In comparison, power plants that can produce electricity continuously – as long as you feed them fuels such as coal or natural gas – don’t present the same problem for utilities.

Dealing with variable power output isn’t a serious problem for utilities yet because wind and solar make up only a tiny share of the overall energy mix.  In Germany, the largest solar energy market in the world, solar accounts for 3 percent of its power supply. In the United States, solar made up less than 1 percent of the power produced in 2010, according to the Energy Information Administration.

But utilities in many industrialized and developing countries are anticipating a growth in wind and solar energy generation as a result of government mandates to increase the use of cleaner energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. China has set some big goals: it upped its solar energy generation target last month to 15 gigawatts by 2015 from the previous goal of 10 gigawatts. It had installed less than 1 gigawatt of solar by the end of 2010. The government promotes solar energy generation by setting higher prices solar electricity to ensure a good return for project developers and owners, a practice that has long be used by countries such as Germany.

China’s plan to add lots of renewable energy means it could be a huge market for energy storage technology, battery companies say. Several American battery companies, such as A123 Systems and ZBB Energy, have formed joint ventures with Chinese companies and developed pilot projects in China. Boston-Power announced an infusion of investments from Chinese investors last fall and is moving the bulk of its operation to China. It’s building a lithium-ion battery factory near Shanghai.

Does Size Matter? 

At 36 megawatt-hours, BYD’s project is the largest in physical size and energy capacity for lithium-ion battery storage. At its peak charging and discharging speed, the batteries can deliver 20 megawatts of power in one hour and 45 minutes, Austin said. But State Grid commissioned the system to discharge power more slowly, over 4 to 6 hours, he added.

The project isn’t the most powerful lithium-ion battery farm in operation though. That title still goes to the project in West Virginia that can deliver 32 megawatts in 15 minutes, said Haresh Kamath, program manager for energy storage at the Electric Power Research Institute, which serves the U.S. utility industry. Utilities could consider this project, developed by AES Energy Storage, to be the largest lithium-ion battery system because of their practice of labeling energy generation projects in terms of megawatts, he said. At 8 megawatt-hours, the AES project doesn’t provide as much energy as the BYD project.

“Megawatt” refers to the speed of charging and discharging a battery while “megawatt-hour” denotes the amount of energy that can be stored or delivered. A battery that is designed for speed doesn’t mean it also can provide energy for a long time. An electric car, for example, ideally wants to have a battery that delivers a lot of power quickly for accelerating and also holds a lot of energy so that it can sustain a long driving range, Kamath said.

The world’s largest battery storage farm is in Japan, but it doesn’t use lithium-ion batteries. Instead, it uses sodium-sulfur batteries and provides 34 megawatts over 7 hours (238 megawatt-hours), Kamath said. The most powerful battery belongs to the Golden Valley Electric Association in Alaska, where a nickel-cadmium battery project can discharge 46 megawatts in five minutes. But ABB designed this project to run 27 megawatts over 15 minutes because that was what the utility wanted (the project holds the Guinness world record for the most powerful battery).

Both figures — power and energy — are important numbers to have to do an accurate comparison of battery storage projects.

“It’s essential to have both numbers. Utilities will want to know both the power levels and how long they are going to get the power,” Kamath said.

View Original Article in Forbes

[BLOGGER COMMENT: In order to achieve energy independence the USA needs to become an innovator and thought leader in renewable energy. Every opportunity for incentives to develop projects than can reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy need to be contemplated. As personal transportation infrastructure hybridizes and electrifies our need for home grown power will intensify. Battery storage and pumped hydro storage are ways to balance the power generation from solar and wind.] 

Bill Gates Calls for Federal Government to Vastly Increase Investments in Renewable Energy R&D

Bill Gates chimed in to express support for the federal government’s role in investing in renewable energy – perhaps he’s had enough of the Solyndra-bashing, which has been turning the public away from solar energy and federal investment in clean energy technologies. 

In an editorial in Science Magazine, he says he not only wants the federal government to continue investing in clean energy research and development, he wants it to increase spending from the current $5 billion a year to $16 billion a year.

“In a time of economic crisis, asking policymakers in Washington, D.C., to spend more money might not be the most popular position. But it’s essential to protect America’s national interests and ensure that the United States plays a leading role in the fast-growing global clean energy industry,” he writes.

“There is really no other choice. Carbon-based fuels are prone to wild price gyrations and are causing the planet to overheat. The United States spends close to $1 billion a day on foreign oil, while countries such as China, Germany, Japan, and Korea are making huge investments in clean energy technologies. The creation of new energy products, services, and jobs is a good thing wherever it occurs, but it would be a serious miscalculation if America missed out on this singular opportunity.”

[BLOGGER COMMENT: The price of creating a solar farm has plunged over the last 5 years. A major demand driver has been the US Treasury Department's 1603 cash grant program that returns 30% of costs to the developer as a cash grant in lieu of a tax credit. This has encouraged the development of utility-scale projects and the additional demand has driven entrepreneurial innovation. The combination of added demand and increased competition has resulted in lower project development costs and lower costs to consumers. The cash grant coupled with falling solar module prices has resulting in solar projects being close to parity with the gold standard, natural gas.]

He notes that federally funded research in energy has declined by over 75% over the past 30 years.

Gates writes:

As someone now working full time in global health and development, I see firsthand how the U.S. government’s support for scientific research has improved people’s lives. That support is vital in another area-affordable, clean energy. I believe it is imperative that the government commit to clean energy innovation at a level similar to its research investments in health and defense.

The United States is uniquely positioned to lead in energy innovation, with great universities and national laboratories and an abundance of entrepreneurial talent. But the government must lend a hand.

Market incentives, alone, will not create enough affordable, clean energy to get the nation to near-zero CO2 emissions, the level of emissions that developed countries must achieve if we are going to keep Earth from getting even hotter.

Moreover, developing major new technologies, where the time frames necessary for true innovation stretch past the normal horizons of patent protection, requires up-front investments that are too large for venture capital and traditional energy companies.

History has repeatedly proven that federal investments in research return huge payoffs, with incredible associated benefits for U.S. industries and the economy. Yet over the past three decades, U.S. government investment in energy innovation has dropped by more than 75%. In 2008, the United States spent less on energy R&D as a percentage of gross domestic product than China, France, Japan, or Canada.

Last year, I joined with other business leaders in a call to increase federal investment in energy R&D from $5 billion to $16 billion a year (Others, including the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, have also recommended substantial increases.)

Recently, our group, the American Energy Innovation Council (AEIC), issued a second report outlining ways to ensure that government research dollars are targeted wisely to achieve optimal returns.

The report also suggests ways to pay for the increased investment: reducing or eliminating current subsidies to well-established energy industries, diverting a portion of royalties from domestic energy production, collecting a small fee on electricity sales, or imposing a price on carbon. Any combination of these could provide the funds needed to increase energy innovation.

Energy transformations take generations. But if the United States begins in earnest today, the nation’s energy challenges can be solved in ways that truly set America on a path of energy independence and that provide affordable energy for everyone, especially the poor. The return on this kind of investment could change – perhaps even save – the world and provide generations to come with a brighter future.”

View original article

Solar power fuels electric-car charging stations

Florida has sunshine, and drivers of electric cars and plug-in hybrids need a fuel source, so entrepreneurs linked solar power to charging stations

WattNext’s prototype of a RubeStation in Eustis, Fla., is an electric-car-charging station powered by solar panels on the shelter’s roof. The cost to erect the station was $30,000; the 3-year-old Florida company is working on developing a cheaper version.

 

 

EUSTIS, Fla. — Bill Ferree’s plan to use solar energy to charge electric vehicles in Florida is getting its day in the sun.

Ferree, 67, and his two partners in a company named WattNext installed a solar-powered station a month ago in Eustis.

In the next couple of months, WattNext — which has already put in ChargePoint stations for electric cars in and around Eustis — will branch out to Orlando and nearby Sanford and Winter Park.

Ferree also wants to develop shaded structures called “WattTrees” that provide shade while generating electricity from solar panels attached to the roof. A prototype called a RubeStation exists in Eustis.

“Florida is the Sunshine State,” he said. “The weather may not always be perfect, but it’s pretty darn good here.”

Solar power isn’t new to Florida, and other companies are claiming stakes in the industry.

Lake County, Fla., commissioners in February unanimously approved Blue Chip Energy’s plan to build a 40-megawatt plant in a 200-acre cow pasture. It soon could become Florida’s largest solar-energy farm, producing enough power for 8,000 homes.

The project would eclipse Florida Power & Light’s 25-megawatt Next Generation Solar Energy Center in DeSoto County.

Construction began in April on a 6-megawatt solar array at the Orlando Utilities Commission’s Curtis Stanton Energy Center east of Orlando.

Ferree said power generation through solar panels will help “eliminate a significant chunk of the state’s demand for electricity and the financial drain on the economy.”

[BLOGGER COMMENT: This is a great step in the direction of kicking our addiction to fossil fuels and foreign oil. As charging stations like this become more commonplace, it will be easier for transportation to go all-electric. We need to keep in mind that out of our complete use of energy, we only use 30% in our transportation infrastructure. The 70% elephant in the room is energy use in homes, businesses and factories.]

View Original Article in The Columbus Dispatch

A Gold Rush of Subsidies in Clean Energy Search

By Eric Lipton and Clifford Krauss
Published: November 11, 2011 in the NY Times
Blogger Comments by David Repka

WASHINGTON — Halfway between Los Angeles and San Francisco, on a former cattle ranch and gypsum mine, NRG Energy is building an engineering marvel: a compound of nearly a million solar panels that will produce enough electricity to power about 100,000 homes.

The project is also a marvel in another, less obvious way: Taxpayers and ratepayers are providing subsidies worth almost as much as the entire $1.6 billion cost of the project. Similar subsidy packages have been given to 15 other solar- and wind-power electric plants since 2009.

The government support — which includes loan guarantees, cash grants and contracts that require electric customers to pay higher rates — largely eliminated the risk to the private investors and almost guaranteed them large profits for years to come. The beneficiaries include financial firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, conglomerates like General Electric, utilities like Exelon and NRG — even Google.

[BLOGGER COMMENT: The environmentalists want to decrease or eliminate pollution, solar energy does that. The Neo-Cons want energy independence, solar energy does that. The Liberals want to create jobs, the renewable energy industry does that. The Tea Party wants to return to principals of self-sufficiency, renewable energy (once kick-started) does that.

The Investment Tax Credit Cash Grant (30% of allowable costs returned to a project developer within 90 days of putting a project on-line and generating electricity) has been a remarkable magnet attracting investment. This investment has pushed the cost of solar generation close to par with the gold standard, natural gas. Congress and the Obama Administration need to be encouraged to extend the incentives until 2020 so that our future of cheap, low cost, domestically produced electricity can be assured.] 

A great deal of attention has been focused on Solyndra, a start-up that received $528 million in federal loans to develop cutting-edge solar technology before it went bankrupt, but nearly 90 percent of the $16 billion in clean-energy loans guaranteed by the federal government since 2009 went to subsidize these lower-risk power plants [emphasis added by BLOGGER], which in many cases were backed by big companies with vast resources.

Read complete article in the New York Times

Persian Gulf Countries Seeking Alternative Energy Sources

Mr David Weaver group CEO of ESR Technology said that “The vast majority of power generation projects in the Persian Gulf are for power stations using conventional gas for their energy source. But the region is struggling to find enough suitable gas to meet future power demands and the first signs are beginning to emerge of major investment in the region into alternatives.”

He said that “It may seem surprising that, with all the available hydrocarbon reserves, alternatives are figuring increasingly in Gulf region power planning. However this is displaying the classic wisdom ‘In victory plan for defeat.’ In other words, when times are good, build resources against future uncertainty.”

He added that there are 114 active power generation projects of all types in the Gulf Co operation Council countries of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates worth a combined total of well over USD 160 billion.

He said that “A nuclear program study is to be carried out on behalf of Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Development Company and is said to have a budget of USD 4 billion. This project is not connected to the GCC’s nuclear program with the General Secretariat of the GCC budgeting USD 10 billion for the design, supply, build and operation of a nuclear plant for power generation and water desalination in a country yet to be chosen.”

He added that there is also considerable new activity beginning in the renewable energy field, principally in the United Arab Emirates. A design study is being carried out for a USD 500 million solar power plant for the Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company Masdar. The project aims to decrease the use of oil and gas in power generation to preserve hydrocarbon reserves. The UAE’s solar radiation is measured at 2,200 kilowatt hours per square meter per annum. In co operation with the Abu Dhabi Water and Electricity Authority and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, Masdar is also studying the possibility of building a hydrogen fired power plant. The project is in the early stage of study but has a budget of USD 100 million.

[BLOGGER COMMENT: The principals of Bison Energy Partners are investors in a waste-to-energy technology firm that is getting traction in the Gulf States Region. Forward thinking leaders in the Gulf States see a day when their fossil fuel reserve revenues will drop significantly and are actively seeking a solution to turn waste streams into electricity.]

Meanwhile, Dubai is taking a lead in wind power research. A study is being carried out for Dubai Electricity and Water Authority for a USD 1 billion wind farm project. The research is on wind as alternative source for power in the region and is on a grand scale, aiming to supply up to 10% of Dubai city’s power requirement. The scope of work involves the meteorological study, design, supply, installation and operation of 70 metre high wind turbines.

In addition, the growing energy demands of the region have also raised the prospect of clean burn, coal fired power stations. A study into a USD 1 billion coal fired power plant is being carried out by Taqa. He said that “Taqa is planning coal fired power plants as an alternative energy, due to increasing demand for power and insufficient gas to meet demand. Similarly, Oman is studying a USD 1 billion coal fired power generation plant at Raysut in southern Oman.”

There are also major plans in Saudi Arabia for waste to energy plants. The plants aim to convert commercially hazardous, organic and toxic wastes into saleable electricity and potable water. One of the first plants could be in Jeddah with 4 to 6 more plants in major cities. Me Weaver added that “All these projects demonstrate that even in the hydrocarbon rich economies of the Persian Gulf, the move towards sustainable and renewable energy sources is gathering pace.”

View Original Article on SteelGuru.com

Shale Gas Revolution

Written by David Brooks and published in the NY Times – Blogger Comment below by David Repka of Bison Energy Partners

The United States is a country that has received many blessings, and once upon a time you could assume that Americans would come together to take advantage of them. But you can no longer make that assumption. The country is more divided and more clogged by special interests. Now we groan to absorb even the most wondrous gifts.

A few years ago, a business genius named George P. Mitchell helped offer such a gift. As Daniel Yergin writes in “The Quest,” his gripping history of energy innovation, Mitchell fought through waves of skepticism and opposition to extract natural gas from shale. The method he and his team used to release the trapped gas, called fracking, has paid off in the most immense way. In 2000, shale gas represented just 1 percent of American natural gas supplies. Today, it is 30 percent and rising.

John Rowe, the chief executive of the utility Exelon, which derives almost all its power from nuclear plants, says that shale gas is one of the most important energy revolutions of his lifetime. It’s a cliché word, Yergin told me, but the fracking innovation is game-changing. It transforms the energy marketplace.

The U.S. now seems to possess a 100-year supply of natural gas, which is the cleanest of the fossil fuels. This cleaner, cheaper energy source is already replacing dirtier coal-fired plants. It could serve as the ideal bridge, Amy Jaffe of Rice University says, until renewable sources like wind and solar mature.

[BLOGGER COMMENT: The USA is the Saudi Arabia of wind. The Heartland of America from the Dakotas South to Texas have enough energy potential to run our entire electricity infrastructure many times over. Wind energy coupled with the solar power opportunities in the Desert Southwest will transform America's energy dependence in our lifetimes. What we need is a bridge technology like natural gas and a smart grid that is capable of distributing all the power created in those remote areas to the dense urban markets that need it most.]

Already shale gas has produced more than half a million new jobs, not only in traditional areas like Texas but also in economically wounded places like western Pennsylvania and, soon, Ohio. If current trends continue, there are hundreds of thousands of new jobs to come.

Chemical companies rely heavily on natural gas, and the abundance of this new source has induced companies like Dow Chemical to invest in the U.S. rather than abroad. The French company Vallourec is building a $650 million plant in Youngstown, Ohio, to make steel tubes for the wells. States like Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York will reap billions in additional revenue. Consumers also benefit. Today, natural gas prices are less than half of what they were three years ago, lowering electricity prices. Meanwhile, America is less reliant on foreign suppliers.

All of this is tremendously good news, but, of course, nothing is that simple. The U.S. is polarized between “drill, baby, drill” conservatives, who seem suspicious of most regulation, and some environmentalists, who seem to regard fossil fuels as morally corrupt and imagine we can switch to wind and solar overnight.

The shale gas revolution challenges the coal industry, renders new nuclear plants uneconomic and changes the economics for the renewable energy companies, which are now much further from viability. So forces have gathered against shale gas, with predictable results.

The clashes between the industry and the environmentalists are now becoming brutal and totalistic, dehumanizing each side. Not-in-my-backyard activists are organizing to prevent exploration. Environmentalists and their publicists wax apocalyptic.

Like every energy source, fracking has its dangers. The process involves injecting large amounts of water and chemicals deep underground. If done right, this should not contaminate freshwater supplies, but rogue companies have screwed up and there have been instances of contamination.

The wells, which are sometimes beneath residential areas, are serviced by big trucks that damage the roads and alter the atmosphere in neighborhoods. A few sloppy companies could discredit the whole sector.

These problems are real, but not insurmountable. An exhaustive study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded, “With 20,000 shale wells drilled in the last 10 years, the environmental record of shale-gas development is for the most part a good one.” In other words, the inherent risks can be managed if there is a reasonable regulatory regime, and if the general public has a balanced and realistic sense of the costs and benefits.

This kind of balance is exactly what our political system doesn’t deliver. So far, the Obama administration has done a good job of trying to promote fracking while investigating the downsides. But the general public seems to be largely uninterested in the breakthrough (even though it could have a major impact on the 21st-century economy). The discussion is dominated by vested interests and the extremes. It’s becoming another weapon in the political wars, with Republicans swinging behind fracking and Democrats being pressured to come out against. Especially in the Northeast, the gas companies are demonized as Satan in corporate form.

A few weeks ago, I sat around with John Rowe, one of the most trusted people in the energy business, and listened to him talk enthusiastically about this windfall. He has no vested interest in this; indeed, his company might be hurt. But he knows how much shale gas could mean to America. It would be a crime if we squandered this blessing.

View article in the NY Times